Is AD 2007-24-10 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 2007-24-10 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 2007-24-10 apply to?

AD 2007-24-10 applies to Turbomeca — models 2S1, 2S2, Arriel. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 2007-24-10

one-time

Official AD 2007-24-10 · FR doc E7-23031 · 2007-11-29 · turboshaft engine

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 2S1 and 2S2 Turboshaft Engines

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) provided by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to identify and correct an unsafe condition on Turbomeca Arriel 2S1 and 2S2 turboshaft engines. The MCAI states the following:

Which aircraft AD 2007-24-10 applies to

MakesTurbomeca

Models2S1, 2S2, Arriel

Applies to all serial numbers of Arriel 2S1 and 2S2 engines that have a hydro mechanical unit (HMU) installed that was manufactured, repaired, or overhauled before December 8, 2006.

Whether AD 2007-24-10 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 2007-24-10 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.