Is AD 98-16699 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 98-16699 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 98-16699 apply to?

AD 98-16699 applies to Airbus — models A300-600. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 98-16699

one-time

AD 98-16699 · 1998-06-25 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes

What this AD requires

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 and all Model A300-600 series airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection for cracking of the gantry lower flanges in the main landing gear (MLG) bay area; and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking of the gantry lower flanges in the MLG bay area, which could result in decompression of the airplane.

Which aircraft AD 98-16699 applies to

MakesAirbus

ModelsA300-600

certain

Whether AD 98-16699 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 98-16699 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.