Airworthiness Directive 96-05-03

recurring
Official AD 96-05-03 · FR doc 96-6450 · 1996-03-18 · turbine engine

Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Inc. TFE731 Series Turbofan Engines

What this AD requires

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Garrett Engine Division) TFE731 SeriesTurbofan Engines, that currently requires inspection of fan rotor disks within certain schedules. This amendment requires initial and repetitive eddy current inspections using an improved, more definitive procedure for detecting fan rotor disk dovetail slot cracks. Also, this amendment adds additional engine models and fan rotor disk part numbers and disallows fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) as an alternative inspection method for detecting fan rotor disk dovetail slot cracks. This amendment is prompted after additional analyses revealed that stress levels in the fan rotor disk dovetail slots for the applicable engine models are higher than initially calculated. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncontained failure of fan rotor disks due to fatigue cracking in the dovetail slots, which can result in inflight engine shutdowns, severe secondary damage, and fan rotor assembly separation from the engine.

Repetitive inspection. Re-inspect. The next-due date/hours depend on this aircraft’s time in service — a records report computes it from the logbooks.

Which aircraft AD 96-05-03 applies to

MakesAlliedsignal
ModelsTFE731-2, TFE731-2A, TFE731-3, TFE731-3A, TFE731-3AR, TFE731-3B, TFE731-3BR, TFE731-3C, TFE731-3CR, TFE731-3D, TFE731-3DR, TFE731-3R, TFE731-4R, TFE731
Part-conditional3072162-1 through -5, 3072816-1, 3072816-2, 3072816-3, 3073436-1 through -5, 3073539-(All), 3074529-(All).

Applies only to engines with fan rotor disks bearing the listed part numbers, regardless of prior modification/alteration/repair in the affected area; installed on but not limited to Dassault Falcon 10/50/100, Learjet 31/35/36/55, Lockheed 1329-23/-25, IAI 1124/1125, Cessna 650/Citation III/VI/VII, Raytheon/BAe HS-125, and Sabreliner NA-265-65 aircraft.

Whether AD 96-05-03 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 96-05-03 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.