Airworthiness Directive 95-4371

recurring
AD 95-4371 · 1995-02-24 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes; Correction

What this AD requires

This action makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive (AD) 95-02-18 concerning Beech Aircraft Corporation Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D airplanes, which was published in the Federal Register on February 3, 1995 (60 FR 6652). That publication inadvertently referenced an incorrect repetitive inspection interval for Models 1900 and 1900C airplanes with a part number 129-910032-79 engine truss installed. The inspection interval in sections B and C of the engine truss should be 3,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) instead of 100 hours TIS. This action corrects the AD to reflect this repetitive inspection interval.

Repetitive inspection. Re-inspect every 100 hours. The next-due date/hours depend on this aircraft’s time in service — a records report computes it from the logbooks.

Which aircraft AD 95-4371 applies to

MakesBeech
Models1900, 1900C, 1900D
Part-conditional129-910032-79.

with a part number 129-910032-79 engine truss installed

Whether AD 95-4371 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

Supersession

Supersedes AD 92-06-09.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 95-4371 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.