TailplateTailplate
Run a report

Airworthiness Directive 93-16-15

one-time
AD 93-16-15 · 1993-01-01 · other

Airworthiness Directives; series, 402 series, 414 series; Cirrus VK-30; Lancaire IV; Mooney M20K with Rocket Engineering Corporation "Rocket Mooney" STC; Na

Which aircraft AD 93-16-15 applies to

MakesCessnaCirrusLancairMooneyNavionQuestairRocket Engineering Corporation
ModelsD55/A, E55/A, 58/A/P/PA/TC/TCA, 310R, T310P/Q/R, 320 D/E/F, VK-30, Lancair IV, M20K, Model H, 58, 310, 320, 335, 340, 401, 402, 414

Source text is a mid-document fragment; the specific affected hardware/component is not named in the captured applicability text, only a broad cross-manufacturer list of twin/high-performance airplanes (58/D55/E55-series, Cessna 310/320/335/340/401/402/414, Cirrus VK-30, Lancair IV, Mooney M20K with Rocket Engineering Corporation 'Rocket Mooney' STC, Navion Model H, Questair). The manufacturer for the D55/A, E55/A, 58-series models is not explicitly stated in the captured text.

Whether AD 93-16-15 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
Date — When the work was done.
Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 93-16-15 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.