Is AD 2019-24029 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 2019-24029 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 2019-24029 apply to?

AD 2019-24029 applies to Rotax — models 914 F2, 914 F3, 914 F4, 914. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 2019-24029

one-time

AD 2019-24029 · 2019-11-04 · reciprocating engine

Airworthiness Directives; BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co KG Engines

What this AD requires

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co KG (Rotax) 914 F2, 914 F3, and 914 F4 model engines. This AD requires removal of a certain exhaust valve and its replacement with a part eligible for installation. This AD was prompted by a report of a broken exhaust valve installed on a Rotax 914 model engine. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Which aircraft AD 2019-24029 applies to

MakesRotax

Models914 F2, 914 F3, 914 F4, 914

Part-conditional — 854113.

Applies only when exhaust valve P/N 854113 with production lot number 0317 or 0517 is installed.

Whether AD 2019-24029 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 2019-24029 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.