Airworthiness Directive 2015-01-02

one-time
Official AD 2015-01-02 · FR doc 2015-00007 · 2015-01-22 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Models MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, MU-2B-36, MU-2B-36A, and MU-2B-60 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as stress corrosion cracking in the flanges of the airframe at stations 4610 and 5605. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Which aircraft AD 2015-01-02 applies to

MakesMitsubishi Heavy Industries
ModelsMU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, MU-2B-36, MU-2B-36A, MU-2B-60, MU-2
Serial-conditional — narrows to serials 502–651, 653–660, 662–696, 661SA–661SA, 697SA–799SA, 1501SA–1569SA.

MU-2B-30/-35/-36 serial numbers 502 through 651, 653 through 660, and 662 through 696; MU-2B-36A and MU-2B-60 serial numbers 661SA, 697SA through 799SA, and 1501SA through 1569SA.

Whether AD 2015-01-02 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2015-01-02 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.