Is AD 2013-16-02 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 2013-16-02 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 2013-16-02 apply to?

AD 2013-16-02 applies to Dassault Aviation — models Falcon 7X. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 2013-16-02

one-time

Official AD 2013-16-02 · FR doc 2013-18640 · 2013-08-06 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes. This AD requires incorporation of a new procedure into the airplane flight manual (AFM). This AD was prompted by a report of a runway excursion caused by failure of the nose landing gear position feed-back assembly. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct an incorrect angle signal causing an un-commanded nose wheel deflection, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.

Which aircraft AD 2013-16-02 applies to

MakesDassault Aviation

ModelsFalcon 7X

Applies to all serial numbers of the listed models.

Whether AD 2013-16-02 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 2013-16-02 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.