Airworthiness Directive 2013-05-12

one-time
Official AD 2013-05-12 · FR doc 2013-05839 · 2013-03-29 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A. Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that high rate discharge (HRD) bottle explosive cartridges of a cargo compartment fire extinguisher system were swapped between the forward and aft cargo compartments. Additional investigation also revealed the possibility of swapping between the electrical connectors of the HRD and low rate discharge (LRD) bottles, and a rotated installation of the HRD bottle. Improper assembly of the fire extinguishing bottle might cause the extinguishing agent to be discharged toward the unselected cargo compartment rather than toward the cargo compartment with fire. This AD requires an inspection of the HRD bottle for correct installation and to determine if the pressure switch is in the correct position, and re-installation if necessary; an inspection of the HRD and LRD bottle discharge heads to determine the part number, and replacement if necessary; and, for certain airplanes, an inspection to identify the HRD and LRD bottle electrical connectors, and relocation if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent the inability of the fire extinguishing system to suppress fire.

Which aircraft AD 2013-05-12 applies to

MakesEmbraer
ModelsERJ 170-100 LR, ERJ 170-100 STD, ERJ 170-100 SE, ERJ 170-100 SU, ERJ 170-200 LR, ERJ 170-200 SU, ERJ 170-200 STD, ERJ 190-100 STD, ERJ 190-100 LR, ERJ 190-100 IGW, ERJ 190-200 STD, ERJ 190-200 LR, ERJ 190-200 IGW, ERJ 190-100 ECJ, ERJ 170, ERJ 190

ERJ 170-100/-200 series as identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 170-26-0011, Revision 02, dated October 17, 2012; ERJ 190-100/-200 series as identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 190-26-0011, Revision 02, dated October 17, 2012; ERJ 190-100 ECJ as identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 190LIN-26-0006, Revision 02, dated September 28, 2012.

Whether AD 2013-05-12 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2013-05-12 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.