Airworthiness Directive 2013-03-13

one-time
Official AD 2013-03-13 · FR doc 2013-02902 · 2013-02-12 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A. Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of the cockpit door falling off the hinges when it is being opened or closed. This AD requires replacing the striker and quick- release pin of the passive lock of the cockpit door, and replacing the upper and lower hinges of the cockpit door. We are issuing this AD to prevent the cockpit door from falling off the hinges, which could cause injury to airplane occupants.

Which aircraft AD 2013-03-13 applies to

MakesEmbraer
Models-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -200 LR, -200 SU, -200 STD, -100 ECJ, -100 IGW, -200 IGW, ERJ 170, ERJ 190

Applicability limited to airplanes identified in EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170-52-0055, Revision 01, dated August 1, 2011 (ERJ 170 models); and EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190-52-0038, Revision 01, dated August 1, 2011, and Service Bulletin 190LIN-52-0020, dated August 1, 2011 (ERJ 190 models).

Whether AD 2013-03-13 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2013-03-13 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.