Airworthiness Directive 2012-06-03
one-timeAirworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) Airplanes
What this AD requires
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports that the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA) no-back and the number 1 motor brake assembly (MBA) can both fail dormant. This AD requires revising the airplane maintenance schedule to include new functional tests of the HSTA no-back and HSTA brake system. We are issuing this AD to prevent dormant failure of the HSTA no-back and the number 1 MBA, which along with additional component failure could result in an uncontrollable horizontal stabilizer surface runaway without the ability to retrim, and consequent loss of the airplane.
Which aircraft AD 2012-06-03 applies to
Common name: Challenger 300. AD also requires revising operator maintenance documents to add new inspections (compliance required under 14 CFR 91.403(c)); if a prior modification/alteration/repair prevents accomplishing the inspections, the operator must request an alternative method of compliance per paragraph (j).
Whether AD 2012-06-03 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.
How AD compliance is recorded
A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:
Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.
Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.