Is AD 2012-22-10 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

Yes — AD 2012-22-10 requires a repetitive inspection every 6600 hours. Next-due depends on the aircraft's time in service.

Airworthiness Directive 2012-22-10

Q: Which aircraft does AD 2012-22-10 apply to?

AD 2012-22-10 applies to Bombardier, Inc. — models CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600-2E25, CL-600. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

recurring

Official AD 2012-22-10 · FR doc 2012-26961 · 2012-11-09 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL- 600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that certain wing-to-fuselage attachment nuts do not conform to the certification design requirements for dual locking features. This AD requires repetitive inspections to determine that cotter pins are installed at affected wing-to-fuselage attachment joints and replacement if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of wing-to-fuselage attachment joints, which could result in the loss of the wing.

Repetitive inspection. Re-inspect every 6600 hours. The next-due date/hours depend on this aircraft’s time in service — a records report computes it from the logbooks.

Which aircraft AD 2012-22-10 applies to

MakesBombardier, Inc.

ModelsCL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600-2E25, CL-600

Serial-conditional — narrows to serials 10002–10999, 15001–15990, 19001–19990.

Serial ranges correspond to designations respectively: CL-600-2C10 (Series 700/701/702) SN 10002-10999; CL-600-2D15 (Series 705) and CL-600-2D24 (Series 900) SN 15001-15990; CL-600-2E25 (Series 1000) SN 19001-19990.

Whether AD 2012-22-10 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 2012-22-10 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.