Airworthiness Directive 2010-20-19

one-time
Official AD 2010-20-19 · FR doc 2010-24482 · 2010-10-01 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes; Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) Airplanes; Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) Airplanes; and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Which aircraft AD 2010-20-19 applies to

ModelsCL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600
Serial-conditional — narrows to serials 7305–8051, 10003–10260, 15001–15106.

Serial ranges correspond to specific designations: CL-600-2B19 SN 7305-8051 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440); CL-600-2C10 SN 10003-10260 (Series 700, 701, 702); CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 combined SN 15001-15106 (Series 705 and Series 900).

Whether AD 2010-20-19 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2010-20-19 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.