Is AD 2010-17-01 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 2010-17-01 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 2010-17-01 apply to?

AD 2010-17-01 applies to Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. — models PW617F-E, PW600. Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 2010-17-01

one-time

Official AD 2010-17-01 · FR doc 2010-20714 · 2010-08-23 · turbine engine

Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. PW617F-E Turbofan Engines

What this AD requires

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Which aircraft AD 2010-17-01 applies to

MakesPratt & Whitney Canada Corp.

ModelsPW617F-E, PW600

Part-conditional — 35C4540-01.

Applies only if a fuel/oil heat exchanger (FOHE), P/N 35C4540-01, is installed. Installed on, but not limited to, Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A (EMB) 500 airplanes.

Whether AD 2010-17-01 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 2010-17-01 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.