TailplateTailplate
Run a report

Airworthiness Directive 2010-14-14

one-time
Official AD 2010-14-14 · FR doc 2010-16182 · 2010-07-22 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 Airplanes

What this AD requires

We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI for EMBRAER Model ERJ 170 airplanes describes the unsafe condition as:

Which aircraft AD 2010-14-14 applies to

MakesEmbraer
ModelsERJ 170-100 LR, ERJ 170-100 STD, ERJ 170-100 SE, ERJ 170-100 SU, ERJ 170-200 LR, ERJ 170-200 STD, ERJ 170-200 SU, ERJ 190-100 ECJ, ERJ 190-100 LR, ERJ 190-100 IGW, ERJ 190-100 STD, ERJ 190-200 STD, ERJ 190-200 LR, ERJ 190-200 IGW, ERJ 170, ERJ 190
Part-conditional — 1001447-3, 1001447-4.

Applies only to airplanes equipped with a Hamilton Sundstrand low pressure check valve (LPCV): ERJ 170 models require P/N 1001447-3; ERJ 190 models require P/N 1001447-3 or 1001447-4.

Whether AD 2010-14-14 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
Date — When the work was done.
Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2010-14-14 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.