Airworthiness Directive 2003-04-23

one-time
Official AD 2003-04-23 · FR doc 03-4484 · 2003-02-28 · propeller

Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. Model HC-B3TN-5( ) Propellers

What this AD requires

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5( ) propellers, with blades part number (P/N) T10176H(B,K)-5 or T10178H(B)-11(R) that are installed on Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd, MU-2 series airplanes. This amendment requires replacement of those blades with blades of the latest design. This amendment is prompted by a report of in-flight propeller blade separation that caused a severe out-of- balance condition, damage to the airplane, and resulted in engine shutdown and a safe landing. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent propeller blade separation, damage to the airplane, and possible loss of the airplane.

Which aircraft AD 2003-04-23 applies to

Applies to Hartzell propeller blades addressed by Hartzell SB HC-SB-61-250, Revision 1, dated April 8, 2002 (blade separation prevention); specific propeller model designations are not present in the extracted applicability text.

Whether AD 2003-04-23 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2003-04-23 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.