Is AD 03-17018 a recurring Airworthiness Directive?

No — AD 03-17018 is a one-time directive. Verify it was complied with in the aircraft's records.

Which aircraft does AD 03-17018 apply to?

AD 03-17018 applies to Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )Hc-( )(2,3)(X,V)( )-( ). Serial/part conditions may narrow it to specific aircraft.

Airworthiness Directive 03-17018

one-time

AD 03-17018 · 2003-07-08 · propeller

Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )HC-( )(2,3)(X,V)( )-( ) Series and HA-A2V20-1B Series Propellers with Aluminum Blades; Correction

What this AD requires

This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive (AD) 97-18-02R1 applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )HC-( )(2,3)(X,V)( )-( ) series and HA-A2V20-1B series propellers with aluminum blades that was published in the Federal Register on June 26, 2003 (68 FR 37960). The Amendment number was omitted from the second paragraph of the Amendatory Language Section. This document corrects that omission. In all other respects, the original document remains the same.

Which aircraft AD 03-17018 applies to

MakesHartzell Propeller Inc. ( )Hc-( )(2,3)(X,V)( )-( )

Whether AD 03-17018 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of compliance — The specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.

Date — When the work was done.

Aircraft time — Total time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.

Signature & certificate — The A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.

Is AD 03-17018 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.