Airworthiness Directive 2000-25-08

recurring
Official AD 2000-25-08 · FR doc 01-6284 · 2001-03-20 · airframe

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D; and AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters

What this AD requires

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to Eurocopter France (ECF) Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D; and AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters. That AD currently requires inspecting the main gearbox suspension bi-directional cross beam (cross beam) for cracks, replacing the cross beam if a crack is found, and adding time intervals for repetitive dye-penetrant inspections on cross beams with 5,000 or more hours time-in-service (TIS). This amendment requires the same inspections as the existing AD but would delete repetitive dye-penetrant inspections on cross beams with 5,000 or more hours TIS. This amendment is prompted by the discovery that repetitive dye-penetrant inspections were erroneously required in the existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the cross beam that could lead to rotation of the main gearbox, severe vibrations, and a subsequent forced landing.

Repetitive inspection. Re-inspect. The next-due date/hours depend on this aircraft’s time in service — a records report computes it from the logbooks.

Which aircraft AD 2000-25-08 applies to

ModelsAS-350B, AS-350BA, AS-350B1, AS-350B2, AS-350D, AS-355E, AS-355F, AS-355F1, AS-355F2, AS-355N, AS-350, AS-355

Text explicitly names 'Model AS-350' and 'Model AS-355' helicopters, and 'Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D' / 'Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N' for the terminating modification. Requires repetitive visual/dye-penetrant inspection of the main gearbox cross beam per Eurocopter France SB 05.00.28 (AS-350) / 05.00.29 (AS-355), both dated May 26, 1997; terminating action via SB 63.00.07 (AS-350) / 63.00.13 (AS-355), both dated April 7, 1997.

Whether AD 2000-25-08 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.

How AD compliance is recorded

A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:

Method of complianceThe specific action taken (inspected, replaced, modified) and to what revision.
DateWhen the work was done.
Aircraft timeTotal time in service / tach at compliance — how recurring next-due is computed.
Signature & certificateThe A&P/IA who returned it to service, with certificate number.
Is AD 2000-25-08 complied with on your aircraft?

Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.

Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)

Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.