Airworthiness Directive 2000-02-20
recurringAirworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes Equipped With General Electric Model CF6-80C2 Series Engines
What this AD requires
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, that currently requires tests, inspections, and adjustments of the thrust reverser system. That AD also requires installation of a terminating modification, and repetitive follow-on actions. This amendment reduces the repetitive intervals for the follow-on actions. This amendment is prompted by reports indicating that several center drive units (CDU's) of the thrust reverser system were returned to the manufacturer of the CDU's because of low holding torque of the CDU cone brake. The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure the integrity of the fail safe features of the thrust reverser system by preventing possible failure modes in the thrust reverser control system that can result in inadvertent deployment of a thrust reverser during flight.
Which aircraft AD 2000-02-20 applies to
Applies to Boeing 767 airplanes identified in the (truncated) preceding applicability provision, including those previously modified/altered/repaired in the affected area. Restates AD 95-13-12 R1 repetitive thrust-reverser system tests/inspections/adjustments (Boeing SB 767-78-0047 Rev 3); the line-number range 1-474 governs installation of a third locking system on the left- and right-hand engine thrust reversers under paragraph (c).
Whether AD 2000-02-20 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.
How AD compliance is recorded
A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:
Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.
Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.