Airworthiness Directive 2000-11-52
one-timeAirworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-76 Series Helicopters
What this AD requires
This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-11-52, which was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-76 series helicopters by individual letters. This AD requires determining the serial number (S/N) of each main rotor blade and removing certain serial numbered main rotor blades. This AD also requires visually inspecting and replacing, if necessary, other certain serial numbered main rotor blades. This AD is prompted by a report of a crack in a main rotor blade and three reports of root end pocket separation from main rotor blades during flight. The crack and the main rotor blade root end pocket separation were due to improper manufacture of certain main rotor blade skins. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent main rotor blade root end pocket separation, impact with main rotor or tail rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Which aircraft AD 2000-11-52 applies to
Main rotor blade root-end pocket separation; affected blades identified by serial number in Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 76-65-50 Group 1 (remove) and Group 2 (repetitive 3-hour inspection); blades repaired per Sikorsky ORI No. 76150-023 Rev A and marked RS-023-1 are excluded. Specific helicopter model not explicitly named in the excerpted text.
Whether AD 2000-11-52 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.
How AD compliance is recorded
A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:
Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.
Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.