Airworthiness Directive 2000-10-10
recurringAirworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters
What this AD requires
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to Eurocopter France Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters and requires inspecting the main gearbox suspension bi-directional cross-beam (cross-beam) for cracks, and replacing the cross-beam if a crack is found. This amendment requires the same inspections as the existing AD, but adds the time intervals for performing repetitive dye-penetrant inspections on cross-beams with 5,000 or more hours time-in-service (TIS). This amendment is prompted by the discovery that time intervals for performing the required dye-penetrant inspections are not included in the existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the cross-beam that could lead to rotation of the main gearbox, resulting in severe vibrations and a subsequent forced landing.
Which aircraft AD 2000-10-10 applies to
Concerns cross-beam supporting the main gearbox. Repetitive visual/dye-penetrant inspection thresholds keyed to cross-beam hours TIS/operating cycles per Eurocopter France SB 05.00.28 (AS-350) or SB 05.00.29 (AS-355), both dated May 26, 1997. Modification per Eurocopter SB 63.00.07 (Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, D) or SB 63.00.13 (Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, N), both dated Apr 7, 1997, is terminating action.
Whether AD 2000-10-10 actually applies to your aircraft (by serial and installed parts) and whether it’s already complied with comes from that aircraft’s records.
How AD compliance is recorded
A valid compliance record (14 CFR 43.9) states:
Tailplate reads a tail number’s logbooks and matches every applicable AD — including this one — to its compliance evidence, with recurring next-due dates computed.
Look up a tail number →Read the full directive (Federal Register)Applicability is derived from the FAA directive corpus and is advisory, not a legal airworthiness determination. Compliance is established only from an aircraft’s actual records.